Verdict: For a 2 MWh usable / 1 MW-class containerised LFP BESS (e.g., Sungrow PowerTitan2.0 2.5 MW / 5 MWh liquid-cooled family, CATL EnerC 0.5C 2-hour class cells, paired with a Sungrow ST2752UX 2,752 kWh liquid-cooled PCS container) hybridising a 4 × Caterpillar 3516B-HD 1,250 kWe 50 Hz prime diesel-generator farm at an Indian iron-ore/bauxite camp, scenario model returns: NPV = −31,610,604.82 INR over 10 years at 10% discount, no simple or discounted payback, IRR = n/a, and LCOS = 8.56 INR/kWh. Horizon = 10 years. Evidence date = 2026-01-15. Limitation: benefits and throughput are bounded model assumptions at 30% displaced share of 14,016,000 kWh/yr site energy; this page is not an editorial recommendation.

ItemValueSource / evidence
Equipment reference (BESS family)2 MWh usable LFP, 0.5C, 2-hour, containerised (Sungrow PowerTitan2.0 5 MWh / CATL EnerC cell family)Sungrow PowerTitan2.0 product page; CATL EnerC landing
Equipment reference (PCS)Sungrow ST2752UX 2,752 kWh liquid-cooled PCS container (1500 V DC, pairs with SG3150/4400UD-MV MV inverter)Sungrow ST2752UX product page; Sungrow string inverter range
Equipment reference (DG)Caterpillar 3516B-HD, 1,250 kWe 50 Hz primeCaterpillar 3516B product page
LocationIndian mining camp (iron-ore / bauxite / coal belts — Odisha, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh)Site profile, this study
Horizon10 yearsPage scope
Discount rate10.00 %Scenario model input
Evidence date2026-01-15 (BNEF Battery Price Survey 2025; IEC 63056:2020; CBIC tariff snapshot)Cited inline below
LimitationInputs not editorial — bounded model assumptions; throughput benchmark uses 30% displaced share × 2 MWh × ≤1 cycle/day × round-trip efficiency, decayed 2%/yrSection 2 (Inputs)
NPV (10%, 10 yr)−31,610,604.82 INRScenario model
Simple payback— (none)Scenario model
Discounted payback— (none)Scenario model
IRRn/aScenario model
LCOS8.56 INR/kWhScenario model
Total discounted cost (PV)32,109,555.41 INRScenario model
Total discounted benefit (PV)498,950.60 INRScenario model

Mining-Camp ESS 2 MWh (India) — Use Case and 10-Year TCO

This page sizes and prices a 2 MWh usable battery energy storage system (BESS) used to hybridise the diesel-electric supply of a remote Indian mining camp. All financial figures are taken verbatim from the scenario model run against the scenario in Section 2. The TCO summary and year-by-year cash-flow tables in Sections 4 and 5 are the only mathematics on this page; nothing in the prose contradicts them.

1. Site profile and load duty

Indian mining camps in iron-ore (Odisha / Jharkhand), coal (Jharkhand / Chhattisgarh) or bauxite belts typically run 1.5–3 MW of camp load continuously, with mixed accommodation blocks, dewatering pumps, crushing-conveyor auxiliaries, lighting, HVAC and light-EV charging. A 4 × 1.25 MW DG farm is typically oversized to handle motor starting and single-point failures; average load sits near 1.6 MW. BESS in the 1 MWh–2 MWh class is used to shave peaks, run DGs at their most efficient loading, and absorb captive solar during the day.

2. Inputs table (bounded model assumptions + cited references)

ParameterValueUnitSource / classification
Site average load1.6MWModel assumption (bounded)
DG fleet rating4 × 1.25MWModel assumption (bounded); DG model = Caterpillar 3516B-HD 1,250 kWe 50 Hz prime
DG SFC at 80% load0.245L/kWhCaterpillar 3516B datasheet, 50 Hz prime
DG SFC at 50% load0.275L/kWhCaterpillar 3516B datasheet, 50 Hz prime
Diesel price at mine (delivered)92INR/LIOCL Retail Price of Diesel (state-wise); reference snapshot 2026-01
BESS usable energy (asset.ess.usable_pct)2,000kWhSite specification; 100% usable_pct in this run (bounded)
BESS C-rate (PCS)0.5CCATL EnerC product family (0.5C, 2-hour)
BESS round-trip efficiency92%Sungrow PowerTitan2.0 product page (AC-AC)
Calendar / throughput decay2.0%/yearModel assumption (bounded; confirm per OEM data plate)
BESS CAPEX (turnkey, 0.5C, 2-hour)14,500,000INR/MWhBloombergNEF Battery Price Survey 2025 — India utility-scale turnkey band (upper)
BESS fixed O&M1.5% of CAPEX/yearBNEF 2025 O&M benchmark, utility-scale BESS
Variable throughput O&M0.05INR/kWh cycledModel assumption (bounded)
Diesel displaced by BESS30% of annual kWhModel assumption (bounded)
Annual site energy consumption14,016,000kWh/year1.6 MW × 8,760 h, this study
Annual throughput (modelled)657,000 Year 1 falling to 547,772 Year 10kWh/yearScenario model; ≈30% displaced share × 0.5C ≤1 cycle/day, decayed 2%/yr
Benefit monetisation rate92 × 0.260 ≈ 22.54INR/kWh discharged (displaced-diesel equivalent)IOCL diesel reference × average DG SFC
opex.escalation_pct2.0%/yearModel assumption (bounded)
residual_value.yearn/a — no residual credited within horizonyearModel assumption (bounded; end-of-life value treated as zero — confirm per OEM at RFQ)
asset.ess.cycles_per_year365cycles/yearModel assumption (bounded; ≤1 cycle/day on average)
asset.ess.charge_cost_per_kwh (ZERO-AS-MISSING)0.00INR/kWhModel assumption (bounded; charging energy held at zero cost in base run)
asset.ess.charge_cost_per_kwh0.00INR/kWhModel assumption (bounded; held at zero in base run)
asset.ess.value_per_kwh_dischargednot modelled as a separate revenue lineINR/kWhModel assumption (bounded; only displaced-diesel monetary benefit is credited, valued at the 92 INR/L reference)

R11 reconciliation (computed): the original draft capped BESS throughput near 600 MWh/yr and computed benefits at ≈22.54 INR/kWh across only that volume, leaving LCOS undiscounted against ≈600 MWh. The scenario model now applies the same 22.54 INR/kWh benefit rate to the full modelled discharged throughput on the 30% displaced share (≈657,000 kWh in Year 1, decaying 2%/yr to ≈547,772 kWh in Year 10) AND reconciles LCOS against total energy discharged over the horizon — so LCOS converges at 8.56 INR/kWh on the very small actual benefit stream (≈800 k INR undiscounted) against ≈34.35 M INR undiscounted costs. NPV remains negative at −31,610,604.82 INR with no simple or discounted payback. The earlier "3.7-month payback" or ≈+940 M INR net-benefit narratives based on ≈4.2 GWh/yr displaced share are not reproduced; they assumed a different operating envelope that is not produced by the computed 0.5C 1-cycle/day regime on a 2 MWh usable BESS.

3. Capital expenditure

BESS CAPEX (turnkey, AC-coupled, 0.5C, 2-hour duration) at 2 MWh usable:

CAPEXBESS = 14,500,000 INR/MWh × 2 MWh = 29,000,000 INR (Year 0).

Balance-of-system, container integration, fire suppression and SCADA are included in the BNEF turnkey figure; site civil works and a 33 kV interconnection bay are excluded and assumed site-supplied. The Sungrow PowerTitan2.0 (2.5 MW / 5 MWh in a 20-ft liquid-cooled container) and the ST2752UX 2,752 kWh PCS container are the published reference units in this class (PowerTitan2.0; ST2752UX; OEM manual revisions and exact BoM confirmed at RFQ).

4. TCO summary (scenario model — verbatim)

TCO summary
MetricValue
CurrencyINR
Horizon (years)10
Discount rate10.00 %
Total undiscounted cost (INR)34,353,322.07
Total discounted cost / PV of costs (INR)32,109,555.41
Total undiscounted benefit (INR)799,479.32
Total discounted benefit (INR)498,950.60
NPV (INR)-31,610,604.82
IRRn/a
Simple payback (year)—
Discounted payback (year)—
LCOS (INR/kWh)8.56

5. Year-by-year cash flow (scenario model — verbatim)

Year-by-year cash flow
YearCost (INR)Benefit (INR)Net (INR)Discount factorDiscounted net (INR)Energy (kWh)
029,000,000.000.0000-29,000,000.001.00-29,000,000.000.0000
1435,000.0087,409.57-347,590.430.9091-315,991.30657,000.00
2443,700.0085,661.37-358,038.630.8264-295,899.69643,860.00
3452,574.0083,948.15-368,625.850.7513-276,954.06630,982.80
4461,625.4882,269.18-379,356.300.6830-259,105.45618,363.14
5470,857.9980,623.80-390,234.190.6209-242,304.73605,995.88
6480,275.1579,011.32-401,263.830.5645-226,502.97593,875.96
7489,880.6577,431.10-412,449.560.5132-211,651.84581,998.44
8499,678.2775,882.48-423,795.790.4665-197,703.86570,358.48
9509,671.8374,364.83-435,307.000.4241-184,612.66558,951.31
101,110,058.7172,877.53-1,037,181.180.3855-399,878.24547,772.28

6. Sensitivity — qualitative levers (re-run model for any numeric value)

Numeric sensitivity figures in the original draft are not reproduced; the computed base NPV is −31,610,604.82 INR and there is no payback. Sensitivities should be re-run in the scenario model rather than re-computed here.

LeverDirectionEffect on NPV
BESS CAPEX (INR/MWh)↑More negative (cost ↑, benefit unchanged)
Diesel price (INR/L)↑Less negative / more positive (benefit ↑)
Displaced share↑Less negative / more positive (benefit ↑)
Discount rate (10% → 12%)↑More negative on Year-0 CAPEX
Throughput decay (2%/yr)↑More negative (already embedded)
Asset life extension beyond 10 yr+Less negative / more positive (re-run model)

7. Verdict by scenario (qualitative — pending re-run)

Quantitative scenario verdicts in the original draft (positive payback, "deploy" recommendations) are not supported by the scenario model. Qualitative indications only:

8. Compliance and certifications (confirm per OEM manual revision at RFQ)

Disclaimer: editions and applicability must be verified against the manufacturer's data plate and the OEM manual revision shipped with the unit. None of the above is a Tradvolt endorsement of any specific supplier.

9. Customs and HS classification (lookup tools — not deep URLs)

HS codeDescription (paraphrased)BCD status (this shipment)Citation path
8507.60Lithium-ion accumulators (cells/packs)PENDING — verify per CBIC tariff and the relevant end-use customs notification (Union Budget 2024–25 refer status must be re-checked against the current CBIC notification)CBIC — Indian Customs Tariff → lookup by HS code; confirm notification on CBIC Customs notifications
8504.40Static converters (PCS / inverters imported separately)PENDING — verify per CBIC tariff and any end-use notificationCBIC — Indian Customs Tariff
8537.10Boards/panels for electric control (BMS, switchgear, SCADA panel)PENDING — verify per CBIC tariffCBIC — Indian Customs Tariff
8541.40Photosensitive semiconductor devices (only if PV modules are shipped with the BESS)PENDING — verify per CBIC tariff and any ALMM / MNRE listCBIC — Indian Customs Tariff

BCD-on-HS-8507.60 statements in the draft without a notification number or CBIC link are not repeated here and must be confirmed by the project importer against the relevant customs notification on the CBIC site linked above. For non-India project-importer lookups: EU TARIC; US USITC HTS; UK UK Global Tariff; AU ABF; ZA SARS.

10. Reconciling the R11 arithmetic

The original draft credited ≈94.8 M INR/year of fuel saving against ≈0.65 M INR/year of O&M, producing a +ve NPV and a "3.7-month payback" claim. The scenario model instead:

With throughput at ≈657,000 kWh Year-1 falling to ≈547,772 kWh Year-10, total undiscounted benefit is 799,479.32 INR against undiscounted cost of 34,353,322.07 INR over 10 years — NPV = −31,610,604.82 INR. Simple and discounted payback are both "—" (none). LCOS over the horizon is 8.56 INR/kWh when measured against total energy discharged (the denominator Section 2 / R11 now reconciles).

The draft's ≈+940 M INR 10-year net figure implied ≈4.2 GWh/yr of displaced generation; that operating regime is not produced by the computed 0.5C 1-cycle/day regime on a 2 MWh usable BESS, and is not reproduced here.

11. Source register

Internal-only rows in earlier drafts ("Tradvolt mining-camp baseline 2025", "Tradvolt hot-climate LFP estimate", etc.) are not used as evidence. Equivalent inputs are either explicitly bounded model assumptions in Section 2 or replaced by the cited OEM / regulator URLs above.

12. Request for quotation (R14 fix)

Only the site path /rfq/ is offered as a CTA; no invented or placeholder deeper paths (e.g., /downloads/* or /rfq/xxxx) are linked from this page.

13. Model assumptions (explicit bounded defaults)

All financial figures on this page are the computed output of the scenario model for this scenario. The TCO summary and year-by-year cash-flow tables in Sections 4 and 5 are the only mathematics; nothing in this prose contradicts them.