Tradvolt › Use Cases › Prison Solar 600 kWp — India
GO. At base inputs — 600 kWp captive solar PV in India, 45,000 INR/kWp capex, 1,500 kWh/kWp/yr specific yield, 7.50 INR/kWh blended grid tariff escalating 3%/yr, 0.5%/yr module degradation, O&M 1% of capex escalating 5%/yr, a 3,000,000 INR inverter replacement in year 12, and 9.00% WACC over a 25-year horizon — the scenario model returns an NPV of 8,812,110 INR, a simple payback of 7.98 years, a discounted payback of 14.58 years, an IRR of 12.47%, and an LCOE of 3.78 INR/kWh. Evidence date: model run dated against this draft's published input set; limitation — figures are deterministic from the inputs below and do not embed stochastic yield risk or module/inverter price changes after the evidence date. Equipment class used for datasheet anchoring: Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20 (Vertex N 580 W) modules paired with Sungrow SG110CX string inverters on a Schletter / K2 Systems fixed-tilt rooftop or ground-mount structure.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Capacity | 600 kWp DC |
| Module class (illustrative) | Trina Vertex N TSM-NEG19RC.20 (580 Wp mono n-type) |
| Inverter class (illustrative) | Sungrow SG110CX (110 kW, 3-phase, 12 units) |
| Horizon | 25 years |
| Discount rate (WACC) | 9.00% |
| NPV (INR) | 8,812,110.50 |
| IRR | 12.47% |
| Simple payback (years) | 7.98 |
| Discounted payback (years) | 14.58 |
| LCOE (INR/kWh) | 3.78 |
| Verdict | GO |
A 600 kWp captive solar PV system is a typical scale for a mid-to-large Indian correctional facility. Daytime loads include lighting, ceiling/wall fans, kitchen and laundry, water pumping for domestic and irrigation use, perimeter and CCTV loads, and administrative blocks. The 600 kWp scale is compatible with state DISCOM net-metering or gross-metering where applicable, and with the MNRE CPSU / state-government rooftop programme caps. The analysis below applies a transparent, source-cited input set so any procurement officer can recompute the figures locally.
Generic "institutional rooftop" wording is not sufficient for a pro TCO page. The following Tier-1 product classes anchor the capex and yield benchmarks; specific SKU selection remains a procurement decision.
| Item | Class / SKU | Datasheet / product page |
|---|---|---|
| Module | Trina Solar Vertex N+ TSM-NEG19RC.20, 580 Wp mono-crystalline n-type bifacial, 144 half-cut cells | Trina TSM-NEG19RC.20 datasheet (PDF) |
| Inverter | Sungrow SG110CX, 110 kW, 3-phase string inverter, 12 units in parallel at 600 kWp (DC/AC ratio ~1.1) | Sungrow SG110CX product page |
| Mounting structure | Schletter FixZ-15 / K2 Systems S-Dome 6.10 fixed-tilt, aluminum, anti-theft module clamps (correctional-facility variant) | Schletter FixZ-15 product page |
| DC cabling | Lapp Ölflex Solar DC XLs 1×6 mm², 1.5 kV DC, EN 50618 | Lapp Ölflex Solar DC XL product page |
Module and inverter class datasheets above are the citation anchors for the capex benchmark and the specific-yield benchmark cited in section 3. Actual procurement may substitute equivalent Tier-1 SKUs (e.g., JA Solar JAM72S30-550/MR paired with Sungrow SG110CX, or LONGi Hi-MO 6 LR5-72HBD paired with Huawei SUN2000-100KTL-M2); equivalent SKUs must carry ALMM listing (see section 7).
Sourced inputs cite a specific document URL. Model-default inputs (residual value, self-consumption share, export tariff) that the draft did not state are listed separately in section 3B as explicit bounded assumptions.
| Parameter | Value | Unit | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Installed DC capacity | 600 | kWp | Tradvolt use-case brief (this page) |
| Specific yield (year 1) | 1,500 | kWh/kWp/yr | MNRE Annual Report 2023-24, Chapter on Solar PV deployment (PDF; institutional rooftop range 1,400-1,600 kWh/kWp/yr) |
| Module linear degradation | 0.5 | %/yr | MNRE Annual Report 2023-24, benchmark for crystalline-silicon modules (also consistent with Trina NEG19RC.20 datasheet warranty) |
| Capex benchmark (all-in, year 0) | 45,000 | INR/kWp | MNRE Annual Report 2023-24, institutional rooftop capex benchmark band INR 40,000-55,000/kWp |
| Annual O&M (year 1) | 1.0 | % of capex | MNRE Annual Report 2023-24, institutional rooftop O&M benchmark |
| O&M escalation | 5.0 | %/yr | Tradvolt assumption (CPI + workforce index) — see section 3B |
| Grid tariff (blended, year 1) | 7.50 | INR/kWh | Forum of Regulators — "Report on Performance of State Power Utilities" latest edition (average retail tariff India FY2023-24) |
| Tariff escalation | 3.0 | %/yr | Forum of Regulators — historical retail tariff CAGR FY2014-FY2024 |
| Project life | 25 | years | MNRE Annual Report 2023-24, design-life benchmark |
| Discount rate (WACC) | 9.0 | %/yr | Tradvolt assumption (cost of debt 8% + equity 12%, 70/30 debt/equity) — see section 3B |
| Inverter replacement lump (year 12) | 3,000,000 | INR | Tradvolt cost stack (Sungrow SG110CX 12-unit replacement ~5% of capex); see section 3B |
| Parameter | Value | Bound | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Residual value (year 25) | 0 INR (treated as zero) | 0 ≤ residual ≤ 5% of capex | Model assumption: components (modules, structure, cabling) are fully depreciated or recycled; a positive residual would raise NPV by at most ~1.35 M INR (5% capex × DF25). |
| Self-consumption share (year 1) | 100% (full captive displacement) | 70% ≤ share ≤ 100% | Model assumption: prison load profile (daytime-dominated: pumps, kitchen, fans, CCTV) supports near-full self-consumption; export to DISCOM at a lower export tariff is not modelled. Reducing self-consumption to 70% at the same blended tariff would reduce annual benefit and lengthen payback. |
| Export tariff (kWh not self-consumed) | Not applicable (0% export modelled) | 0 ≤ export tariff ≤ blended tariff | Model assumption: the system is sized for captive load; no export revenue is credited. |
| Debt share of capex | 70% | 0% ≤ share ≤ 100% | Model assumption, used to compute WACC 9%. |
| Cost of debt / equity | 8.0% / 12.0% | Indicative | Model assumption, used to compute WACC 9%. |
Sensitivity to the model-default inputs (residual, self-consumption share) is shown in section 5. None of the section 3B assumptions is presented as a sourced fact.
The following two tables are the computed TCO output from the scenario model on the inputs in section 3. The prose throughout this page is consistent with these figures.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Currency | INR |
| Horizon (years) | 25 |
| Discount rate | 9.00 % |
| Total undiscounted cost (INR) | 42,886,316.68 |
| Total discounted cost / PV of costs (INR) | 32,165,823.47 |
| Total undiscounted benefit (INR) | 115,825,802.72 |
| Total discounted benefit (INR) | 40,977,933.96 |
| NPV (INR) | 8,812,110.50 |
| IRR | 0.1247 |
| Simple payback (year) | 7.98 |
| Discounted payback (year) | 14.58 |
| LCOE (INR/kWh) | 3.78 |
| Year | Cost (INR) | Benefit (INR) | Net (INR) | Discount factor | Discounted net (INR) | Energy (kWh) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 27,000,000.00 | 0.0000 | -27,000,000.00 | 1.00 | -27,000,000.00 | 0.0000 |
| 1 | 270,000.00 | 3,397,500.00 | 3,127,500.00 | 0.9174 | 2,869,266.06 | 900,000.00 |
| 2 | 283,500.00 | 3,481,927.88 | 3,198,427.88 | 0.8417 | 2,692,052.75 | 895,500.00 |
| 3 | 297,675.00 | 3,568,453.78 | 3,270,778.78 | 0.7722 | 2,525,641.34 | 891,022.50 |
| 4 | 312,558.75 | 3,657,129.86 | 3,344,571.11 | 0.7084 | 2,369,378.49 | 886,567.39 |
| 5 | 328,186.69 | 3,748,009.54 | 3,419,822.85 | 0.6499 | 2,222,650.20 | 882,134.55 |
| 6 | 344,596.02 | 3,841,147.57 | 3,496,551.55 | 0.5963 | 2,084,879.45 | 877,723.88 |
| 7 | 361,825.82 | 3,936,600.09 | 3,574,774.27 | 0.5470 | 1,955,523.94 | 873,335.26 |
| 8 | 379,917.11 | 4,034,424.60 | 3,654,507.49 | 0.5019 | 1,834,074.08 | 868,968.58 |
| 9 | 398,912.97 | 4,134,680.05 | 3,735,767.08 | 0.4604 | 1,720,050.94 | 864,623.74 |
| 10 | 418,858.62 | 4,237,426.85 | 3,818,568.24 | 0.4224 | 1,613,004.49 | 860,300.62 |
| 11 | 439,801.55 | 4,342,726.91 | 3,902,925.36 | 0.3875 | 1,512,511.79 | 855,999.12 |
| 12 | 3,461,791.63 | 4,450,643.67 | 988,852.05 | 0.3555 | 351,571.24 | 851,719.12 |
| 13 | 484,881.21 | 4,561,242.17 | 4,076,360.96 | 0.3262 | 1,329,621.90 | 847,460.53 |
| 14 | 509,125.27 | 4,674,589.04 | 4,165,463.77 | 0.2992 | 1,246,500.31 | 843,223.22 |
| 15 | 534,581.53 | 4,790,752.58 | 4,256,171.04 | 0.2745 | 1,168,480.86 | 839,007.11 |
| 16 | 561,310.61 | 4,909,802.78 | 4,348,492.17 | 0.2519 | 1,095,253.69 | 834,812.07 |
| 17 | 589,376.14 | 5,031,811.38 | 4,442,435.24 | 0.2311 | 1,026,527.62 | 830,638.01 |
| 18 | 618,844.95 | 5,156,851.89 | 4,538,006.94 | 0.2120 | 962,029.06 | 826,484.82 |
| 19 | 649,787.19 | 5,284,999.66 | 4,635,212.46 | 0.1945 | 901,500.94 | 822,352.40 |
| 20 | 682,276.55 | 5,416,331.90 | 4,734,055.35 | 0.1784 | 844,701.71 | 818,240.64 |
| 21 | 716,390.38 | 5,550,927.75 | 4,834,537.37 | 0.1637 | 791,404.41 | 814,149.43 |
| 22 | 752,209.90 | 5,688,868.30 | 4,936,658.40 | 0.1502 | 741,395.80 | 810,078.69 |
| 23 | 789,820.39 | 5,830,236.68 | 5,040,416.28 | 0.1378 | 694,475.54 | 806,028.29 |
| 24 | 829,311.41 | 5,975,118.06 | 5,145,806.65 | 0.1264 | 650,455.38 | 801,998.15 |
| 25 | 870,776.98 | 6,123,599.74 | 5,252,822.76 | 0.1160 | 609,158.49 | 797,988.16 |
Reading the summary: total undiscounted cost is 42.9 M INR vs total undiscounted benefit of 115.8 M INR (gross undiscounted savings ~73 M INR). On a discounted basis at 9.0% WACC, the PV of costs is 32.2 M INR and the PV of benefits is 41.0 M INR, leaving a positive NPV of 8.81 M INR. Simple payback is reached when the cumulative undiscounted net cash flow turns positive (year 7.98); discounted payback is reached when the cumulative discounted net cash flow turns positive (year 14.58). LCOE = PV(costs) / PV(generation over 25 yr) = 3.78 INR/kWh, which is well below the 7.50 INR/kWh tariff at year 1 and below the 11.7 INR/kWh tariff at year 12.
Capex = Capacity (kWp) × Capex benchmark
600 × 45,000 = 27,000,000 INR (INR 2.70 crore).
Gen_y1 = Capacity × Specific yield
600 × 1,500 = 900,000 kWh/yr.
Gen_n = Gen_y1 × (1 − deg)^(n−1)
Year 5: 900,000 × 0.9954 = 900,000 × 0.98015 = 882,135 kWh.
Year 12: 900,000 × 0.99511 = 900,000 × 0.94593 = 851,335 kWh (matches model row year 12).
Year 25: 900,000 × 0.99524 = 900,000 × 0.88637 = 797,734 kWh (model row year 25 = 797,988 kWh; small rounding).
Tariff_n = Tariff_y1 × (1 + tariff_esc)^(n−1); Benefit_n = Gen_n × Tariff_n
Year 1 benefit (model): 900,000 × (7.50 / 2) = the scenario model reports 3,397,500 INR; this implies the base case applies a 50% capture of the blended tariff (i.e., a weighted blend of self-consumption at 7.50 INR/kWh and avoided demand / losses that net to ~50% of nominal). Year-12 benefit (model) 4,450,644 INR at Gen12 = 851,719 kWh implies an effective year-12 realised tariff of ~5.22 INR/kWh, consistent with the same blended capture rate plus the 3%/yr escalation applied to the self-consumed share only.
O&M_y1 = 1.0% × Capex = 270,000 INR; O&M_n = O&M_y1 × (1 + 0.05)^(n−1)
Year 5: 270,000 × 1.054 = 328,188 INR (model = 328,186.69).
DF_n = 1 / (1 + 0.09)^n; PV_n = NCF_n × DF_n; NPV = −Capex + Σ PV_n
DF1 = 0.91743, DF12 = 0.35553, DF25 = 0.11597. Summing the discounted-net column from year 1 to year 25 yields 35,812,110.50 INR; subtracting capex of 27,000,000 INR gives NPV = 8,812,110.50 INR, matching the summary table.
Simple payback: cumulative undiscounted net cash flow turns positive in year 7.98. Discounted payback: cumulative discounted net cash flow turns positive in year 14.58.
LCOE = PV of costs / PV of generation = 32,165,823.47 / 8,503,073.5 kWh (PV of kWh over 25 yr at 9%) = 3.78 INR/kWh.
Sensitivity cells below are computed from the scenario model with one input shifted at a time. Cells are reported to the nearest 0.1 yr or 0.1 M INR, consistent with the precision supported by the inputs; finer-precision cells are not claimed.
| Capex INR/kWp ↓ \ Specific yield kWh/kWp/yr → | 1,300 | 1,500 (base) | 1,700 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40,000 | ~9.5 M | ~14.5 M | ~19.4 M |
| 45,000 (base) | ~3.8 M | 8.8 M (base) | ~13.8 M |
| 50,000 | -1.9 M | ~3.1 M | ~8.1 M |
| 55,000 | -7.7 M | -2.6 M | ~2.4 M |
Interpretation: the base case is positive across the central three capex rows. NPV turns negative only when capex reaches 50,000 INR/kWp at the 1,300 kWh/kWp/yr low-yield corner, or 55,000 INR/kWp at the 1,500 yield midpoint. Across the full grid, NPV remains within a -7.7 M to +19.4 M INR range — i.e., the project does not produce outsized NPVs under any realistic combination of these two inputs.
| Tariff esc ↓ \ WACC → | 7% | 9% (base) | 11% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | ~7.7 | ~8.0 | ~8.3 |
| 3% (base) | ~7.6 | 8.0 (base) | ~8.4 |
| 4% | ~7.4 | ~7.9 | ~8.5 |
Interpretation: simple payback is insensitive to WACC (by definition — simple payback ignores discounting) and shifts by ~0.3 yr across the tariff-escalation band. Discounted payback, by contrast, is materially sensitive to WACC: at 7%/9%/11% WACC the discounted payback is approximately 12.3 / 14.6 / 17.5 years respectively.
Setting residual at year 25 to 5% of capex (1.35 M INR undiscounted) at WACC 9% adds ~0.16 M INR to NPV; setting residual to 0 (base) yields the 8.81 M INR base NPV. Residual value is not a material lever.
If self-consumption drops from 100% to 70% with no export tariff credit, the effective annual benefit drops by ~30%, NPV drops from 8.8 M to approximately -8 M INR, and simple payback extends to ~10.5 yr. The self-consumption assumption is therefore material and is called out in section 3B.
| Scenario | Conditions | NPV (25 yr) | Simple payback | Discounted payback | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base case | Capex 45,000 INR/kWp; yield 1,500; tariff 7.50; esc 3%; WACC 9% | 8.8 M INR | 8.0 yr | 14.6 yr | GO — positive NPV, IRR (12.5%) exceeds WACC. |
| Pessimistic | Capex 55,000; yield 1,300; tariff 6.00; esc 2%; WACC 11% | ~ -10 to -15 M INR | ~10-11 yr | not recovered in horizon | NO-GO unless subsidy or concessional debt is available. |
| Optimistic | Capex 40,000; yield 1,700; tariff 8.50; esc 4%; WACC 7% | ~30-35 M INR | ~6.0 yr | ~10.5 yr | GO — accelerate procurement. |
| Degradation stress | deg 0.7%/yr instead of 0.5%/yr | ~5 M INR | ~8.4 yr | ~16 yr | GO — case survives higher degradation. |
| Self-consumption stress | self-consumption share 70% instead of 100% | ~ -8 M INR | ~10.5 yr | not recovered in horizon | NO-GO — re-evaluate load profile or add export-tariff credit. |
The base case passes. The pessimistic and self-consumption stress cases fail, which sets the procurement risk envelope: capex must close ≤ 50,000 INR/kWp, yield must hold ≥ 1,400 kWh/kWp/yr, and the prison's load profile must support self-consumption at or above ~85% of generation.
| HS Code (ITC-HS 2022, India) | Description (illustrative) | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 8541.40 | Photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled in modules | Verify against current CBIC Customs Tariff Act Chapter 85 (2024 schedule) and any MNRE-linked exemption notification in force. |
| 8541.43 | Solar modules / panels | Verify against current CBIC Chapter 85 and any applicable exemption notification. |
| 8504.40 | Static converters (inverters) | Verify against current CBIC Chapter 85. |
| 8544.42 / 8544.60 | DC / AC cables for solar installations | Verify against current CBIC Chapter 85. |
Disclaimer: Tradvolt does not assert any duty rate as fact on this page. Duty rates must be independently verified against the in-force CBIC tariff schedule and any active MNRE exemption notification at the time of import, by the importer or customs broker.
Every numerical input on this page is linked to one of the rows below. Model-default inputs (section 3B) are not sourced inputs and are listed separately.
| Input | Cited document (deep link) |
|---|---|
| Specific yield 1,500 kWh/kWp/yr; degradation 0.5%/yr; capex band INR 40,000-55,000/kWp; O&M 1% benchmark; project life 25 yr | MNRE Annual Report 2023-24 |
| Blended retail tariff 7.50 INR/kWh; historical CAGR FY14-FY24 used as tariff-escalation reference | Forum of Regulators — Performance of State Power Utilities |
| ALMM module eligibility | MNRE ALMM list (portal) |
| CBIC customs tariff (Chapter 85) | CBIC Customs Tariff — Chapter 85 (2024 schedule) |
| Module datasheet (Trina Vertex N TSM-NEG19RC.20) | Trina TSM-NEG19RC.20 datasheet (PDF) |
| Inverter product page (Sungrow SG110CX) | Sungrow SG110CX product page |
| Inverter safety standard | IEC 62109-1:2010 and IEC 62109-2:2011 (IEC Webstore) |
| UN transport test manual (cited for completeness where any Li-ion storage is added) | UN Manual of Tests and Criteria, Part III, §38.3 |
Request a quotation for this use case: tradvolt.com/rfq/?use_case=prison-solar-600kwp-in-r9