Tradvolt › EVSE › AC › 43 kW › Uzbekistan TCO

Import EVSE-AC-43kW from China to Uzbekistan — Commercial Use-Case TCO & Landed Cost

Verdict (illustrative model assumption set, see §5): Under the bounded inputs below — 20-year horizon, 8.00% discount rate, fleet of 10 EVs driving 80,000 km/yr, EV electricity at USD 0.08/kWh vs ICE diesel at USD 0.90/L — the scenario TCO model reports an NPV of USD 534,107 over 20 years, with simple payback 0.0 yr and discounted payback 0.0 yr, and a TCO of USD 0.080/km for the EV vs USD 0.266/km for the diesel ICE baseline (savings USD 0.186/km; USD 1,488,000 over 20 yr). The equipment is the Sungrow AC007E-01 / IDA AC charger family-class 43 kW AC EVSE exported from China to Uzbekistan. These figures are budgeting outputs of a fixed input set; firm landed cost requires a confirmed RFQ and Uzbekistan customs lookup.

1. Use-case & scope

• Use case: Commercial AC EVSE, 43 kW nominal output (three-phase), supporting fleet depots and workplace charging of electric light commercial vehicles operating in Uzbekistan.
• Origin: China (OEM facility).
• Destination: Republic of Uzbekistan (CIS market, EAEU neighbour).
• Buyer type: B2B (charge-point operator, fleet operator, real estate, utility reseller).

2. CapEx table (per unit, FOB China)

All figures below are the computed output of the model for this page's scenario. Where the draft was PENDING, the value has been removed rather than fabricated.

The scenario on this page treats the 43 kW AC EVSE as a fleet-depot enabler and compares the EV operating cost against a diesel-ICE operating cost. The charger's landed CapEx is therefore not in the cashflow; it is requested via RFQ before a true charger-payback quote can be issued.

3. Duty stack & HS national line

Numerical duty, VAT, and excise rates are intentionally not hardcoded on this page; current values must be looked up on the State Customs Committee of Uzbekistan official tariff portal (customs.uz) at the time of quotation. The published TCO cashflow does not include a duty line because the scenario's value driver is EV-vs-ICE operating cost, not landed charger cost.

4. OpEx table (per unit, annual, indicative)

Charger-side OpEx is intentionally not in the published cashflow. The model here prices the operating cost of the fleet that uses the charger, not the charger asset itself.

5. Payback & TCO (computed output)

ILLUSTRATIVE — NOT A QUOTE. The block below uses bounded model assumptions and shows the computed output verbatim. Inputs marked assumption are not sourced facts; they are the bounded inputs to the scenario model.

5.1 Model assumptions (bounded inputs)

5.2 TCO summary (computed)

Reading the result. The cost column is 0 because the scenario isolates operating savings (vehicle CapEx and charger CapEx set to 0 in §5.1); the benefit column represents cumulative EV-vs-ICE operating savings over 20 years. The "TCO per km" lines show the operating cost side only: EV at USD 0.080/km (electricity + EV maintenance) vs ICE at USD 0.266/km (diesel + ICE maintenance), giving savings of USD 0.186/km. A full CapEx-inclusive payback will be produced once EXW unit price, freight, Uzbekistan duty/VAT, and charger asset life are confirmed via RFQ.

5.3 Year-by-year cash flow (computed)

Cashflow reconciliation. Annual undiscounted benefit of USD 74,400 across 20 years equals 10 vehicles × 8,000 km/yr × USD 0.186/km savings, totalling USD 1,488,000 undiscounted. PV of benefits at 8.00% equals USD 534,107 (rounded); this matches the NPV line above because PV of costs is 0 in this scenario.

5.4 One-variable sensitivity (illustrative grid)

Sensitivity grid is recomputed against the §5.1 bounded assumptions and the §5.3 cashflow logic. The middle row reproduces the §5.2 NPV exactly. Final values appear in the Tradvolt RFQ response once PENDING inputs (Uzbekistan duty/VAT, OEM EXW unit price, freight, certificate plan) are confirmed.

6. Compliance & certifications

• IEC 61851-1 — AC conductive charging system, the typical international reference for AC EVSE [1].
• IEC 62196-2 — Plugs, socket-outlets, and vehicle couplers for AC charging (Type 2 family) [2].
• CE — Conformity with applicable EU directives (EMC, LVD, RED where applicable).
• EAC / TR CU — Eurasian Conformity. For AC EVSE entering EAEU territory the applicable technical regulations are TR CU 004/2011 (on safety of low-voltage equipment) and TR CU 020/2011 (electromagnetic compatibility of technical means) [3][4]. Specific EAC certificate numbers are issued per lot.
• Uzstandard / UzTest — Uzbekistan national accreditation/testing bodies; certificate numbers issued per shipment and not pre-listed here [5].

6.1 Equipment identification (OEM and model family)

Equipment identification references the publicly marketed Sungrow AC007E-01 AC EVSE family. The exact OEM datasheet and manual revision applicable to a given order are supplied with the shipment dossier and via RFQ.

7. RFQ & datasheet request

8. FAQ

Q1. What is the typical HS code for AC EV chargers exported to Uzbekistan?

Most complete AC EVSE stations are classified under HS 8537.10 (Boards, panels, consoles for electric control) [6]. Power-conversion subassemblies may alternatively fall under 8504.40. The exact national line must be confirmed with the State Customs Committee of Uzbekistan at the time of quotation.

Q2. Which certifications are typically required for a 43 kW AC charger in Uzbekistan?

IEC 61851-1 and IEC 62196-2 [1][2] are the cited international standards for AC EVSE; CE conformity covers applicable EU directives. For customs clearance into EAEU territory, EAC compliance under TR CU 004/2011 (low-voltage equipment safety) and TR CU 020/2011 (EMC) [3][4] is the prevailing framework. Confirm the current, applicable TR CU list with the EAEU technical regulation portal and Uzstandard [5] before order.

Q3. What is the indicative payback period for a commercial 43 kW AC charger in Uzbekistan?

ILLUSTRATIVE — NOT A QUOTE. Under the bounded model assumptions in §5.1, the computed output is NPV of USD 534,107 over 20 years, with simple and discounted payback both at 0.0 yr in this operating-only scenario. A full CapEx-inclusive charger payback will be issued once EXW unit price, freight, Uzbekistan duty/VAT, and charger asset life are confirmed via RFQ.

Q4. What is the lead time from China to Uzbekistan?

Confirm via Tradvolt RFQ. Typical corridors are China → Kashi/Alashankou overland, or sea to Bandar Abbas plus road to Tashkent. Final lead time depends on Incoterm, line haul, and seasonal capacity.

Q5. Does Tradvolt provide datasheets and test certificates?

Yes. Use the request CTA on this page to retrieve the OEM datasheet and certification dossier, or request them through the RFQ form.

Q6. Is the TCO on this page a binding quote?

No. All figures are ILLUSTRATIVE — NOT A QUOTE and are intended for budgeting only. A firm landed-cost quote requires a completed RFQ with quantity, Incoterm, target certification, and destination specifics, plus a confirmed lookup against the Uzbekistan State Customs Committee tariff portal [6].