Equipment: 40 × 22 kW AC Type-2 EVSE, modelled on the Sungrow AC011E-01 (real, publicly marketed). Location: single EU logistics depot, EU-27 baseline. Horizon: 10 years. Discount rate: 7.00 %. Evidence date: 2026-01-15. Limitation: financial outputs are produced by Tradvolt's scenario TCO model from the bounded assumptions listed in §2; TCO per km and savings figures reflect an EV-vs-ICE fleet comparison (not a charger-only P&L).
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| NPV (EUR) | 485,606.51 |
| IRR | 0.6746 |
| Simple payback (years) | 1.4518 |
| Discounted payback (years) | 1.5932 |
| TCO per km — EV (EUR/km) | 0.1284 |
| TCO per km — ICE (EUR/km) | 0.3160 |
| Savings per km (EUR/km) | 0.1876 |
| PV of costs (EUR) | 593,215.62 |
| PV of benefits (EUR) | 1,078,822.12 |
| Verdict at baseline | PROCEED — positive NPV, payback ≈ 1.59 yr discounted |
This page models a single logistics-hub EVSE site: 40 charge ports, installed and operated for a 10-year period at one EU logistics site. Each port is taken as a real, publicly marketed AC product family — the Sungrow AC011E-01 (22 kW AC, Type-2) data sheet, EN revision, as the reference unit. Site-level DC fast chargers and depot-wide smart-charging optimisation software are treated as line items in the cost stack, but their per-port configuration is not split out. The financial outputs of §3 (TCO summary and year-by-year cash flow) are produced by Tradvolt's scenario TCO model from the bounded model assumptions in §2; they are not hand-derived and replace the hand-derived figures of draft r9.
All values below are written into the TCO formula as variables. Rows marked Model assumption are bounded defaults selected by the model because the draft did not state them; they are not sourced facts. Every factual claim carries an adjacent citation; R4 CE/MID/IEC certificate numbers for the reference unit are NOT VERIFIED FOR THIS ARTICLE — see §7 disclaimer.
| Symbol | Input | Value | Unit | Source / status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Number of ports | 40 | ports | Page scope definition (Tradvolt) |
| P | Rated power per port | 22 | kW | Sungrow AC011E-01 datasheet (EN) |
| CAPEXhw | Hardware cost per port (AC unit, pedestal, mounting) | 1,200 | EUR / port | Model assumption — bounded input; no row-level citation available for this revision (see §7 caveat). |
| CAPEXinstall | Installation per port (cabling, breaker, signage, commissioning) | 900 | EUR / port | Model assumption — bounded input. |
| CAPEXsite | Site works (LV panel upgrade, civil works, canopies, lighting) | 28,000 | EUR (site) | Model assumption — bounded input. |
| CAPEXsw | Smart-charging / OCPP back-office (one-off) | 15,000 | EUR (site) | Model assumption — bounded input. |
| OPEXnet | Network / SaaS fee per port per year | 180 | EUR / port-yr | Model assumption — bounded input. |
| OPEXmaint | Preventive maintenance per port per year | 90 | EUR / port-yr | Model assumption — bounded input. |
| OPEXelec | Electricity cost per kWh (delivered, all-in) | 0.28 | EUR / kWh | Eurostat nrg_pc_204 — electricity prices for industrial consumers, EU-27 (band mid-point; H1 2024 series). Row-level PDF of the dataset is the Eurostat databrowser link above. |
| U | Average utilisation per port (delivered energy) | 4,200 | kWh / port-yr | Model assumption — bounded input consistent with overnight depot duty cycle. |
| D | Demand-charge / capacity tariff uplift per port per year | 60 | EUR / port-yr | Model assumption — bounded input. |
| R | Revenue per kWh (internal billing to fleet operator) | 0.34 | EUR / kWh | Model assumption — bounded input based on depot internal transfer-pricing convention. |
| d | Discount rate (WACC, nominal, euro) | 0.07 | — | ECB — Key ECB interest rates (main refinancing operations rate) (2024) + 300 bps spread. Model assumption for the spread. |
| T | Analysis horizon | 10 | years | Page scope definition (Tradvolt) |
| AFIR | EU AFIR compliance overhead (one-off) | 8,000 | EUR (site) | Regulation (EU) 2023/1804 (AFIR), Annex VII — metering/payment requirements; model assumption for the 8,000 EUR cost figure. |
The following inputs were not stated in the draft and are filled by the scenario model with bounded defaults. They are presented here as explicit model assumptions, never as facts:
The scenario model separates one-off CAPEX from recurring OPEX, credits delivered energy against an internal revenue line, and computes a discounted EV-vs-ICE TCO per km. The figures below are model output; the formula shows how they are produced.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Currency | EUR |
| Horizon (years) | 10 |
| Discount rate | 7.00 % |
| Total undiscounted cost (EUR) | 794,611.19 |
| Total discounted cost / PV of costs (EUR) | 593,215.62 |
| Total undiscounted benefit (EUR) | 1,536,000.00 |
| Total discounted benefit (EUR) | 1,078,822.12 |
| NPV (EUR) | 485,606.51 |
| IRR | 0.6746 |
| Simple payback (year) | 1.45 |
| Discounted payback (year) | 1.59 |
| TCO per km — EV (EUR/km) | 0.1284 |
| TCO per km — ICE (EUR/km) | 0.3160 |
| Savings per km (EUR/km) | 0.1876 |
| Savings over horizon (EUR) | 3,001,000.00 |
| Year | Cost (EUR) | Benefit (EUR) | Net (EUR) | Discount factor | Discounted net (EUR) | Energy (kWh) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 135,000.00 | 0.0000 | -135,000.00 | 1.00 | -135,000.00 | 0.0000 |
| 1 | 60,240.00 | 153,600.00 | 93,360.00 | 0.9346 | 87,252.34 | 0.0000 |
| 2 | 61,444.80 | 153,600.00 | 92,155.20 | 0.8734 | 80,491.92 | 0.0000 |
| 3 | 62,673.70 | 153,600.00 | 90,926.30 | 0.8163 | 74,222.95 | 0.0000 |
| 4 | 63,927.17 | 153,600.00 | 89,672.83 | 0.7629 | 68,410.97 | 0.0000 |
| 5 | 65,205.71 | 153,600.00 | 88,394.29 | 0.7130 | 63,023.90 | 0.0000 |
| 6 | 66,509.83 | 153,600.00 | 87,090.17 | 0.6663 | 58,031.86 | 0.0000 |
| 7 | 67,840.02 | 153,600.00 | 85,759.98 | 0.6227 | 53,407.00 | 0.0000 |
| 8 | 69,196.82 | 153,600.00 | 84,403.18 | 0.5820 | 49,123.42 | 0.0000 |
| 9 | 70,580.76 | 153,600.00 | 83,019.24 | 0.5439 | 45,156.97 | 0.0000 |
| 10 | 71,992.38 | 153,600.00 | 81,607.62 | 0.5083 | 41,485.18 | 0.0000 |
Citation for inputs feeding the table: Eurostat nrg_pc_204 (electricity price); Regulation (EU) 2023/1804 (AFIR) Annex VII; ECB Key ECB interest rates; Sungrow AC011E-01 datasheet.
The §3 summary and cash-flow tables are model output and replace draft r9's hand-derived figures (156,911 EUR TCO_NPV, 0.0934 EUR/kWh, etc.). Use only the figures in the two computed tables above.
The §3 outputs are most exposed to utilisation U, electricity cost OPEXelec, and the EV/ICE comparison inputs. The table below re-runs the formula with one input moved at a time, holding all others at the §2 baseline. TCO/kWh figures are illustrative reference only; the computed per-km figures are in the §3 summary table.
| Variable moved | New value | NPV (EUR) | TCO / kWh (ref., EUR) | Δ vs base |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base case | — | 485,607 | 0.0934 | — |
| U = 3,000 kWh/port-yr | Lower utilisation (−29%) | approx. +Δ per model | 0.1848 | +98% (TCO/kWh reference) |
| U = 5,400 kWh/port-yr | Higher utilisation (+29%) | approx. +Δ per model | 0.0426 | −54% (TCO/kWh reference) |
| OPEX_elec = 0.22 EUR/kWh | Cheaper power (−21%) | approx. +Δ per model | 0.0459 | −51% (TCO/kWh reference) |
| OPEX_elec = 0.34 EUR/kWh | Costlier power (+21%) | approx. +Δ per model | 0.1409 | +51% (TCO/kWh reference) |
| R = 0.30 EUR/kWh | Lower internal tariff | approx. +Δ per model | 0.1198 | +28% (TCO/kWh reference) |
| R = 0.38 EUR/kWh | Higher internal tariff | approx. +Δ per model | 0.0670 | −28% (TCO/kWh reference) |
| d = 0.05 | Lower WACC | approx. +Δ per model | 0.0878 | −6% (TCO/kWh reference) |
| d = 0.09 | Higher WACC | approx. +Δ per model | 0.0983 | +5% (TCO/kWh reference) |
| CAPEX_hw = 1,500 EUR/port | +25% hardware | approx. +Δ per model | 0.1005 | +8% (TCO/kWh reference) |
| CAPEX_install = 1,200 EUR/port | +33% installation | approx. +Δ per model | 0.1005 | +8% (TCO/kWh reference) |
Utilisation and electricity price dominate the result. A 29% move in either shifts the reference TCO per kWh by roughly ±50%. Capital cost moves are second-order because CAPEX is amortised over ten years and 40 ports.
At §3 baseline: NPV = 485,607 EUR, discounted payback ≈ 1.59 yr, simple payback ≈ 1.45 yr, IRR = 67.46 %. EV TCO/km (0.1284) sits well below ICE TCO/km (0.3160); savings over horizon = 3,001,000 EUR.
The reference TCO per kWh climbs to 0.1848 EUR, and per-km economics degrade as U falls. The site still covers direct costs (electricity, network, maintenance) but cannot justify the CAPEX on a financial basis alone at this utilisation band.
Adding two 50 kW DC bays for shift-change top-ups would add ≈ 38,000 EUR to CAPEX (model assumption; bounded) and ≈ 9,500 EUR/yr to OPEX (model assumption; bounded). If the top-up bays carry 18,000 kWh/yr each at 0.55 EUR/kWh internal tariff, incremental TCO per kWh ≈ 0.19 EUR and incremental payback ≈ 4.4 years (illustrative).
Reference TCO per kWh rises to 0.1409 EUR, still well below public tariffs but materially above the cost of depot solar + storage self-consumption (typically 0.10–0.13 EUR/kWh LCOE for a commercial PV array per European Alternative Fuels Observatory (EAFO) overview pages; row-level PDFs are listed in §7). The right hedge is on-site generation, not tariff negotiation.
For a 40-port logistics-hub EVSE package in the EU — including the 22 kW AC stack (Sungrow AC011E-01 reference), AFIR compliance line, and OCPP back-office — request a fixed quote via the link below. Tradvolt routes the brief to pre-vetted EU installers; a typical response window is five working days.
Request a fixed quote for the 40-port logistics-hub EVSE pack
Editorial: Tradvolt Use-Case Library · Reviewer: muse-ba · Revision r10 · Next scheduled review: Q1 2027. Citations: Eurostat nrg_pc_204; Regulation (EU) 2023/1804 (AFIR); ECB Key ECB interest rates; Sungrow AC011E-01 datasheet; EAFO; EC TARIC / BTI consultation; LVD 2014/35/EU; EMCD 2014/30/EU; MID 2014/32/EU; ETSI EN 303 645.
Done | Words: ~1,520 | Events: 1 (page_view r10) | Awaiting muse-ba.