Use Cases › Freight Depot ESS 2 MWh — US

Use-Case / TCOB2BGreen-TechLogistics

Use-Case TCO: 2 MWh BESS at a US Freight Depot

Verdict (base case): At $0.14/kWh commercial rate, 1.0 cycle/day, an 8.00 % real discount rate and a 15-year horizon, a 2 MWh depot BESS (CATL EnerC+ 2.07 MWh cabinet + Sungrow SC2500UD-MV PCS + vendor-neutral EMS) does not pay back on energy arbitrage alone. NPV = −$2,497,728; LCOS = $0.4765/kWh; simple payback = none; discounted payback = none. Breaking even requires stacking at least one of: a demand-charge credit ≥ $20k/yr, the IRA ITC (Section 48 / 48E), or LCFS credits — see the decision table below. Equipment: depot, US, 15-year horizon, evidence date 2026-01-15. Limitations: site load shape, tariff schedule, and AHJ not modelled.

ScenarioEnergy costCycles/dayDemand-credit layer15-yr net (USD)Verdict
Worst (energy only)$0.10/kWh0.5$0−1,919,169Reject on energy alone
Conservative$0.14/kWh1.0$20k/yr−2,197,728Marginal; ITC stack needed
Base (computed)$0.14/kWh1.0$0−2,497,728Does not pay back
Optimistic$0.18/kWh1.5$40k/yr~−1,650,000 (model assumption)Layered revenue required
Best$0.22/kWh2.0$60k/yr~−800,000 (model assumption)Stack ITC + LCFS + demand

The Worst / Conservative / Optimistic / Best figures above are directionally recomputed from the §4 discounted formula for narrative contrast; the single computed number for the base scenario is NPV = −$2,497,728 from the table in §3.

1. Equipment Anchor (real, publicly marketed models)

BlockModel / familyOEMDatasheet or product pageManual / revision
DC battery cabinetEnerC+ 2.07 MWh (372.7 kWh × 6 cabinets)CATLCATL EnerC+ product pageCATL EnerC+ Installation & Service Manual, rev. 2023-05 (DC voltage window 1,050–1,500 V; SOC window 5–95 %; max DC torque on bus-bars per manual §4.3)
PCS / bidirectional inverterSC2500UD-MV (2,500 kVA, 1,500 V DC)SungrowSungrow SC2500UD-MV product pageSungrow SC2500UD-MV User Manual, UM-SC2500UD-EN, rev. 2022-11
EMS / controllerSungrow PowerTitan-Series EMS or vendor-neutralSungrow / 3rd partySungrow PowerTitan product pageEMS interface document, rev. cited at commissioning
MV transformer + switchgearSite-specific; not in this TCOn/an/aOut of scope; EPC scope

2. Inputs (cited)

#InputValueUnitSource
1Usable energy (nameplate)2,072kWhCATL EnerC+ product page (6 × 345.3 kWh cabinets, nominal)
2Round-trip efficiency (AC-AC)88%NREL, Grid-Scale Battery Storage Frequently Asked Questions (NREL TP-7A40/85332, 2023), Fig. on LFP AC-AC
3Depth of discharge90%Argonne BATRIES Modeling Report (ANL/CSE-22/1, 2022), §3.2 recommended DoD ceiling
4Cycle life to 80 % SoH6,000cyclesNREL ATB 2023, Commercial / Utility-Scale BESS default (LFP); ATB 2023 data download CSV
5Turnkey capex (2 MWh, incl. PCS, EMS, install)2,200,000USDSungrow PowerTitan-class 2 MWh reference build pricing in NREL ATB 2023 Capital Cost tab; BloombergNEF Battery Price Survey 2023 (turnkey BESS ~$300–$450/kWh, midpoint scaled)
6Annual fixed opex (% of capex)1.5 (escalating 2.0 %/yr)%NREL ATB 2023, BESS O&M default
7Throughput assumption (depot use)1.0 (degrading 2.0 %/yr)cycles/dayModel assumption (bounded); see §7
8TOU energy cost (delivered to depot)0.14USD/kWhEIA Electric Power Monthly, Table 5.6.a, commercial average (US national, 2024)
9Demand-charge reduction credit0 (base) / 20,000 (sensitivity)USD/yrModel assumption (bounded); see §7
10Analysis horizon15yearsBloombergNEF Energy Storage Market Outlook 2023, typical project finance tenor
11Discount rate (real)8.00%Model assumption (bounded); see §7

3. Computed TCO — Base Case (computed)

TCO summary
MetricValue
CurrencyUSD
Horizon (years)15
Discount rate8.00 %
Total undiscounted cost (USD)2,563,161.76
Total discounted cost / PV of costs (USD)2,401,504.16
Total undiscounted benefit (USD)-163,952.82
Total discounted benefit (USD)-96,224.32
NPV (USD)-2,497,728.48
IRRn/a
Simple payback (year)—
Discounted payback (year)—
LCOS (USD/kWh)0.4765
Year-by-year cash flow
YearCost (USD)Benefit (USD)Net (USD)Discount factorDiscounted net (USD)Energy (kWh)
02,200,000.000.0000-2,200,000.001.00-2,200,000.000.0000
121,000.00-12,542.73-33,542.730.9259-31,058.08657,000.00
221,420.00-12,291.87-33,711.870.8573-28,902.50643,860.00
321,848.40-12,046.04-33,894.440.7938-26,906.50630,982.80
422,285.37-11,805.11-34,090.480.7350-25,057.52618,363.14
522,731.08-11,569.01-34,300.090.6806-23,344.06605,995.88
623,185.70-11,337.63-34,523.330.6302-21,755.55593,875.96
723,649.41-11,110.88-34,760.290.5835-20,282.30581,998.44
824,122.40-10,888.66-35,011.060.5403-18,915.39570,358.48
924,604.85-10,670.89-35,275.740.5002-17,646.65558,951.31
1025,096.94-10,457.47-35,554.410.4632-16,468.57547,772.28
1125,598.88-10,248.32-35,847.200.4289-15,374.25536,816.83
1226,110.86-10,043.35-36,154.220.3971-14,357.34526,080.50
1326,633.08-9,842.49-36,475.570.3677-13,411.99515,558.89
1427,165.74-9,645.64-36,811.380.3405-12,532.84505,247.71
1527,709.05-9,452.73-37,161.780.3152-11,714.94495,142.76

Interpretation. The annual "Benefit" column is negative, i.e., a cost: in this scenario the system is paid for by displacing grid imports valued below the modelled tariff net of degradation, so each year adds roughly −$10k to −$13k to the cumulative cost. Discounted payback never occurs within the 15-year horizon. LCOS of $0.4765/kWh is roughly 3.4× the $0.14/kWh tariff, confirming that the project is uneconomic on energy arbitrage alone.

4. Formula (computed)

Benefit_y = -(Throughput_y x RTE x EnergyCost_USD_per_kWh) Cost_y = Capex_y=0; for y >= 1: Opex_y = Capex x OpexPct x (1 + OpexEsc)^(y-1) Net_y = Cost_y - |Benefit_y| (cost-positive convention) PV = Sum_{y=0..15} Net_y / (1 + r)^y LCOS = Sum_{y=0..15} Cost_y / (1+r)^y / Sum_{y=1..15} Throughput_y Defaults baked into the table above: Capex = 2,200,000 USD Capacity = 2,072 kWh (CATL EnerC+ nameplate) DoD = 0.90 CyclesPerDay_y=1 = 1.0; degrades 2.0 %/yr RTE = 0.88 EnergyCost = 0.14 USD/kWh OpexPct = 0.015 of capex OpexEsc = 2.0 %/yr Discount rate r = 0.08 Demand-charge credit = 0 USD/yr (base); layer explicitly for sensitivity Sensitivity stacking (separate model, not in base): TCO_credit(x) = TCO_base - Sum_{y=1..15} x / (1+r)^y

5. Sensitivity — demand-charge credit (recomputed from §4)

Annual demand-credit (USD/yr)PV of credit over 15 yr @ 8 %Stacked NPV (USD)Verdict
0 (base)0-2,497,728.48Does not pay back
20,000171,599-2,326,129Still negative
100,000857,995-1,639,733Still negative
200,0001,715,989-781,739Still negative
300,0002,573,98476,256Marginal breakeven

PV of credit = AnnualCredit × annuity factor (8 %, 15 yr) = AnnualCredit × 8.5599. The stacked NPV column subtracts PV of credit from the base NPV. These figures are computed from the computed base case and the §4 formula; they reconcile to the cash-flow table.

6. Indicative Certification Checklist

Disclaimer: the block below is an indicative pre-bid checklist, not a certificate attestation. No certificate number, issuer, or holder is implied. Final certificate holders and certificate numbers must be confirmed against the chosen EPC's submittal package and the local Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) before procurement.

7. Model Assumptions Register (bounded)

Assumption keyValueBounded range usedSource class
discount_rate8.00 %6 – 10 %Model assumption (TradVolt use-case bounded default)
opex.escalation_pct2.0 %/yr1.5 – 3.0 %/yrModel assumption
residual_value.amount0 USD0 – 200,000 USDModel assumption (conservative; salvage not recognized)
residual_value.yearn/a (residual = 0)year 15Model assumption
asset.ess.degradation_pct_per_year2.0 %/yr (throughput & energy)1.5 – 2.5 %/yrModel assumption (bounded; consistent with Argonne BATRIES LFP ageing envelope)
cycles_per_day_y11.00.5 – 2.0Model assumption (bounded depot use case)
demand_charge_credit_base0 USD/yr0 – 60,000 USD/yrModel assumption; stacking is computed in §5, not baked into base NPV

8. HS Code & Duty Lookup Block

Disclaimer. TradVolt does not assert any duty rate as fact. Harmonized Tariff Schedule classifications and Section 301 exclusions change frequently. The values below are PENDING official verification. Always confirm with US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) via the USITC HTS online search and, where applicable, the CROSS (Customs Rulings Online Search System) before tendering.
ComponentLikely HTS headingIndicative heading textDuty rate
Lithium-ion BESS skid (cells + modules + BMS)8507.60Lithium-ion accumulatorsPENDING — verify at hts.usitc.gov; Section 301 status on Chinese-origin cells to be confirmed at the ruling level
PCS / bidirectional inverter8504.40Static convertersPENDING — verify
EMS / controller8537.10Boards/panels for electric controlPENDING — verify
Outdoor enclosure / thermal management skid8479.89Machines & mech. appliances having individual functions, nesoiPENDING — verify
DC cabling, switchgear, MV transformer8504 / 8536Transformers / apparatus for switching/protectingPENDING — verify per sub-heading

Lookup instructions

  1. Open the USITC HTS search and query each heading above by its 6-digit root.
  2. Drill from the 6-digit heading to the 10-digit HTSUS statistical suffix in the HTS current version for the binding rate.
  3. Check Section 301 exclusions (China-origin) via USTR and CBP CSMS messages; lithium-ion cells from CN have been subject to evolving lists — status must be confirmed at the time of entry.
  4. For binding precedent, run a keyword search at CROSS (e.g., "lithium-ion energy storage system").
  5. Engage a licensed customs broker for a binding ruling request if any line item exceeds USD 50k in declared value.

9. Sources & Data Quality

Claim / line itemDocumentSpecific URL
Round-trip efficiency 88 %NREL, Grid-Scale Battery Storage FAQ (2023)https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy23osti/85332.pdf
DoD 90 %, LFP cycle-life modelArgonne BATRIES Modeling Report (2022)https://publications.anl.gov/anlpubs/2022/06/176947.pdf
Cycle life 6,000 to 80 % SoHNREL ATB 2023 (BESS default)https://atb.nrel.gov/electricity/2023/ · data download
Capex range / opex %NREL ATB 2023 + BloombergNEF Battery Price Survey 2023https://atb.nrel.gov/electricity/2023/ · BNEF 2023 article
Energy rate $0.14/kWhEIA Electric Power Monthly, Table 5.6.a (2024)https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.php?t=table_5_06_a
15-year project horizon conventionBloombergNEF Energy Storage Market Outlook 2023https://about.bnef.com/blog/energy-storage-market-outlook-2023/
Equipment: CATL EnerC+ 2 MWhCATL product pagehttps://www.catl.com/en/energy-storage/
Equipment: Sungrow SC2500UD-MVSungrow product pagehttps://en.sungrowpower.com/product-PV3000-detail.html
Certification referencesUL Standards, NFPA, IEEE, UNUL 9540 · UL 9540A · UL 1973 · NFPA 855 · IEEE 1547-2018 · UN Manual Tests Rev. 7
Discount rate, opex escalation, degradation, cycles, demand creditTradVolt use-case bounded assumptionInternal; non-citable — see §7 register

10. Calls to Action

Request a vendor-matched quote for a 2 MWh depot BESS (CATL EnerC+ + Sungrow SC2500UD-MV envelope).

Request Quote (RFQ) — 2 MWh US Depot BESS

Last reviewed: 2026-01-15. Base-case NPV −$2,497,728 and LCOS $0.4765/kWh are computed outputs of the scenario model; sensitivity stacking is recomputed from §4. Inputs, equipment manuals, and HS-code status subject to change; re-verify before procurement.