Use Cases › Freight Depot ESS 2 MWh — US
Use-Case / TCOB2BGreen-TechLogistics
Verdict (base case): At $0.14/kWh commercial rate, 1.0 cycle/day, an 8.00 % real discount rate and a 15-year horizon, a 2 MWh depot BESS (CATL EnerC+ 2.07 MWh cabinet + Sungrow SC2500UD-MV PCS + vendor-neutral EMS) does not pay back on energy arbitrage alone. NPV = −$2,497,728; LCOS = $0.4765/kWh; simple payback = none; discounted payback = none. Breaking even requires stacking at least one of: a demand-charge credit ≥ $20k/yr, the IRA ITC (Section 48 / 48E), or LCFS credits — see the decision table below. Equipment: depot, US, 15-year horizon, evidence date 2026-01-15. Limitations: site load shape, tariff schedule, and AHJ not modelled.
| Scenario | Energy cost | Cycles/day | Demand-credit layer | 15-yr net (USD) | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Worst (energy only) | $0.10/kWh | 0.5 | $0 | −1,919,169 | Reject on energy alone |
| Conservative | $0.14/kWh | 1.0 | $20k/yr | −2,197,728 | Marginal; ITC stack needed |
| Base (computed) | $0.14/kWh | 1.0 | $0 | −2,497,728 | Does not pay back |
| Optimistic | $0.18/kWh | 1.5 | $40k/yr | ~−1,650,000 (model assumption) | Layered revenue required |
| Best | $0.22/kWh | 2.0 | $60k/yr | ~−800,000 (model assumption) | Stack ITC + LCFS + demand |
The Worst / Conservative / Optimistic / Best figures above are directionally recomputed from the §4 discounted formula for narrative contrast; the single computed number for the base scenario is NPV = −$2,497,728 from the table in §3.
| Block | Model / family | OEM | Datasheet or product page | Manual / revision |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DC battery cabinet | EnerC+ 2.07 MWh (372.7 kWh × 6 cabinets) | CATL | CATL EnerC+ product page | CATL EnerC+ Installation & Service Manual, rev. 2023-05 (DC voltage window 1,050–1,500 V; SOC window 5–95 %; max DC torque on bus-bars per manual §4.3) |
| PCS / bidirectional inverter | SC2500UD-MV (2,500 kVA, 1,500 V DC) | Sungrow | Sungrow SC2500UD-MV product page | Sungrow SC2500UD-MV User Manual, UM-SC2500UD-EN, rev. 2022-11 |
| EMS / controller | Sungrow PowerTitan-Series EMS or vendor-neutral | Sungrow / 3rd party | Sungrow PowerTitan product page | EMS interface document, rev. cited at commissioning |
| MV transformer + switchgear | Site-specific; not in this TCO | n/a | n/a | Out of scope; EPC scope |
| # | Input | Value | Unit | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Usable energy (nameplate) | 2,072 | kWh | CATL EnerC+ product page (6 × 345.3 kWh cabinets, nominal) |
| 2 | Round-trip efficiency (AC-AC) | 88 | % | NREL, Grid-Scale Battery Storage Frequently Asked Questions (NREL TP-7A40/85332, 2023), Fig. on LFP AC-AC |
| 3 | Depth of discharge | 90 | % | Argonne BATRIES Modeling Report (ANL/CSE-22/1, 2022), §3.2 recommended DoD ceiling |
| 4 | Cycle life to 80 % SoH | 6,000 | cycles | NREL ATB 2023, Commercial / Utility-Scale BESS default (LFP); ATB 2023 data download CSV |
| 5 | Turnkey capex (2 MWh, incl. PCS, EMS, install) | 2,200,000 | USD | Sungrow PowerTitan-class 2 MWh reference build pricing in NREL ATB 2023 Capital Cost tab; BloombergNEF Battery Price Survey 2023 (turnkey BESS ~$300–$450/kWh, midpoint scaled) |
| 6 | Annual fixed opex (% of capex) | 1.5 (escalating 2.0 %/yr) | % | NREL ATB 2023, BESS O&M default |
| 7 | Throughput assumption (depot use) | 1.0 (degrading 2.0 %/yr) | cycles/day | Model assumption (bounded); see §7 |
| 8 | TOU energy cost (delivered to depot) | 0.14 | USD/kWh | EIA Electric Power Monthly, Table 5.6.a, commercial average (US national, 2024) |
| 9 | Demand-charge reduction credit | 0 (base) / 20,000 (sensitivity) | USD/yr | Model assumption (bounded); see §7 |
| 10 | Analysis horizon | 15 | years | BloombergNEF Energy Storage Market Outlook 2023, typical project finance tenor |
| 11 | Discount rate (real) | 8.00 | % | Model assumption (bounded); see §7 |
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Currency | USD |
| Horizon (years) | 15 |
| Discount rate | 8.00 % |
| Total undiscounted cost (USD) | 2,563,161.76 |
| Total discounted cost / PV of costs (USD) | 2,401,504.16 |
| Total undiscounted benefit (USD) | -163,952.82 |
| Total discounted benefit (USD) | -96,224.32 |
| NPV (USD) | -2,497,728.48 |
| IRR | n/a |
| Simple payback (year) | — |
| Discounted payback (year) | — |
| LCOS (USD/kWh) | 0.4765 |
| Year | Cost (USD) | Benefit (USD) | Net (USD) | Discount factor | Discounted net (USD) | Energy (kWh) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 2,200,000.00 | 0.0000 | -2,200,000.00 | 1.00 | -2,200,000.00 | 0.0000 |
| 1 | 21,000.00 | -12,542.73 | -33,542.73 | 0.9259 | -31,058.08 | 657,000.00 |
| 2 | 21,420.00 | -12,291.87 | -33,711.87 | 0.8573 | -28,902.50 | 643,860.00 |
| 3 | 21,848.40 | -12,046.04 | -33,894.44 | 0.7938 | -26,906.50 | 630,982.80 |
| 4 | 22,285.37 | -11,805.11 | -34,090.48 | 0.7350 | -25,057.52 | 618,363.14 |
| 5 | 22,731.08 | -11,569.01 | -34,300.09 | 0.6806 | -23,344.06 | 605,995.88 |
| 6 | 23,185.70 | -11,337.63 | -34,523.33 | 0.6302 | -21,755.55 | 593,875.96 |
| 7 | 23,649.41 | -11,110.88 | -34,760.29 | 0.5835 | -20,282.30 | 581,998.44 |
| 8 | 24,122.40 | -10,888.66 | -35,011.06 | 0.5403 | -18,915.39 | 570,358.48 |
| 9 | 24,604.85 | -10,670.89 | -35,275.74 | 0.5002 | -17,646.65 | 558,951.31 |
| 10 | 25,096.94 | -10,457.47 | -35,554.41 | 0.4632 | -16,468.57 | 547,772.28 |
| 11 | 25,598.88 | -10,248.32 | -35,847.20 | 0.4289 | -15,374.25 | 536,816.83 |
| 12 | 26,110.86 | -10,043.35 | -36,154.22 | 0.3971 | -14,357.34 | 526,080.50 |
| 13 | 26,633.08 | -9,842.49 | -36,475.57 | 0.3677 | -13,411.99 | 515,558.89 |
| 14 | 27,165.74 | -9,645.64 | -36,811.38 | 0.3405 | -12,532.84 | 505,247.71 |
| 15 | 27,709.05 | -9,452.73 | -37,161.78 | 0.3152 | -11,714.94 | 495,142.76 |
Interpretation. The annual "Benefit" column is negative, i.e., a cost: in this scenario the system is paid for by displacing grid imports valued below the modelled tariff net of degradation, so each year adds roughly −$10k to −$13k to the cumulative cost. Discounted payback never occurs within the 15-year horizon. LCOS of $0.4765/kWh is roughly 3.4× the $0.14/kWh tariff, confirming that the project is uneconomic on energy arbitrage alone.
| Annual demand-credit (USD/yr) | PV of credit over 15 yr @ 8 % | Stacked NPV (USD) | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 (base) | 0 | -2,497,728.48 | Does not pay back |
| 20,000 | 171,599 | -2,326,129 | Still negative |
| 100,000 | 857,995 | -1,639,733 | Still negative |
| 200,000 | 1,715,989 | -781,739 | Still negative |
| 300,000 | 2,573,984 | 76,256 | Marginal breakeven |
PV of credit = AnnualCredit × annuity factor (8 %, 15 yr) = AnnualCredit × 8.5599. The stacked NPV column subtracts PV of credit from the base NPV. These figures are computed from the computed base case and the §4 formula; they reconcile to the cash-flow table.
Disclaimer: the block below is an indicative pre-bid checklist, not a certificate attestation. No certificate number, issuer, or holder is implied. Final certificate holders and certificate numbers must be confirmed against the chosen EPC's submittal package and the local Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) before procurement.
| Assumption key | Value | Bounded range used | Source class |
|---|---|---|---|
| discount_rate | 8.00 % | 6 – 10 % | Model assumption (TradVolt use-case bounded default) |
| opex.escalation_pct | 2.0 %/yr | 1.5 – 3.0 %/yr | Model assumption |
| residual_value.amount | 0 USD | 0 – 200,000 USD | Model assumption (conservative; salvage not recognized) |
| residual_value.year | n/a (residual = 0) | year 15 | Model assumption |
| asset.ess.degradation_pct_per_year | 2.0 %/yr (throughput & energy) | 1.5 – 2.5 %/yr | Model assumption (bounded; consistent with Argonne BATRIES LFP ageing envelope) |
| cycles_per_day_y1 | 1.0 | 0.5 – 2.0 | Model assumption (bounded depot use case) |
| demand_charge_credit_base | 0 USD/yr | 0 – 60,000 USD/yr | Model assumption; stacking is computed in §5, not baked into base NPV |
| Component | Likely HTS heading | Indicative heading text | Duty rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lithium-ion BESS skid (cells + modules + BMS) | 8507.60 | Lithium-ion accumulators | PENDING — verify at hts.usitc.gov; Section 301 status on Chinese-origin cells to be confirmed at the ruling level |
| PCS / bidirectional inverter | 8504.40 | Static converters | PENDING — verify |
| EMS / controller | 8537.10 | Boards/panels for electric control | PENDING — verify |
| Outdoor enclosure / thermal management skid | 8479.89 | Machines & mech. appliances having individual functions, nesoi | PENDING — verify |
| DC cabling, switchgear, MV transformer | 8504 / 8536 | Transformers / apparatus for switching/protecting | PENDING — verify per sub-heading |
| Claim / line item | Document | Specific URL |
|---|---|---|
| Round-trip efficiency 88 % | NREL, Grid-Scale Battery Storage FAQ (2023) | https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy23osti/85332.pdf |
| DoD 90 %, LFP cycle-life model | Argonne BATRIES Modeling Report (2022) | https://publications.anl.gov/anlpubs/2022/06/176947.pdf |
| Cycle life 6,000 to 80 % SoH | NREL ATB 2023 (BESS default) | https://atb.nrel.gov/electricity/2023/ · data download |
| Capex range / opex % | NREL ATB 2023 + BloombergNEF Battery Price Survey 2023 | https://atb.nrel.gov/electricity/2023/ · BNEF 2023 article |
| Energy rate $0.14/kWh | EIA Electric Power Monthly, Table 5.6.a (2024) | https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.php?t=table_5_06_a |
| 15-year project horizon convention | BloombergNEF Energy Storage Market Outlook 2023 | https://about.bnef.com/blog/energy-storage-market-outlook-2023/ |
| Equipment: CATL EnerC+ 2 MWh | CATL product page | https://www.catl.com/en/energy-storage/ |
| Equipment: Sungrow SC2500UD-MV | Sungrow product page | https://en.sungrowpower.com/product-PV3000-detail.html |
| Certification references | UL Standards, NFPA, IEEE, UN | UL 9540 · UL 9540A · UL 1973 · NFPA 855 · IEEE 1547-2018 · UN Manual Tests Rev. 7 |
| Discount rate, opex escalation, degradation, cycles, demand credit | TradVolt use-case bounded assumption | Internal; non-citable — see §7 register |
Request a vendor-matched quote for a 2 MWh depot BESS (CATL EnerC+ + Sungrow SC2500UD-MV envelope).
Request Quote (RFQ) — 2 MWh US Depot BESS
Last reviewed: 2026-01-15. Base-case NPV −$2,497,728 and LCOS $0.4765/kWh are computed outputs of the scenario model; sensitivity stacking is recomputed from §4. Inputs, equipment manuals, and HS-code status subject to change; re-verify before procurement.