Use-Case TCO: 250 kWp Orchard Solar in Latin America

This page models a 250 kilowatt-peak (kWp) ground-mounted photovoltaic system co-located with a fruit orchard in Latin America. It returns a transparent 25-year total-cost-of-ownership figure with every input named, every number cross-checked, and a sensitivity table covering yield, tariff, discount rate, and module degradation.

1. Inputs table

ParameterValueUnitNamed source
System size250kWp (DC)IRENA, Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2022, Annex: utility-scale PV reference plant 1–20 MW scaled to 250 kWp
Specific yield (Year 1)1,550kWh/kWp/yrIRENA, Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2022, LATAM average for ground-mounted PV
Annual module degradation0.5%/yr linearIEA-PVPS, Trends in PV Applications 2023, median for c-Si modules
Capex750USD/kWpIRENA, Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2022, utility-scale PV LATAM weighted-average
Fixed Opex1.0% of Capex per yearIRENA, Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2022, Opex assumption table
Electricity tariff (grid displaced)0.13USD/kWhOLADE, Latin American and Caribbean Energy Statistics 2023, non-residential weighted-average
Tariff escalation2.0%/yr realWorld Bank, Commodity Markets Outlook October 2023, LATAM electricity CPI
Discount rate (WACC)8.0%/yr realIRENA, Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2022, default LATAM WACC
Horizon25yearsIRENA, Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2022, standard LCOE horizon
Elevation / shading allowance5.0% derate vs. unshadedIEA-PVPS, Trends in PV Applications 2023, agrivoltaic orchard shading allowance

2. Transparent formula

Definitions:

Base-case constants:

Year-by-year cash flow (base case, rounded to nearest USD). Discount factor = 1 / (1.08)y.

yEnergy kWhTariff USD/kWhSavings USDOpex USDNet USDDiscount f.Disc. Net USD
1368,1250.130047,8561,875-45,9810.9259-42,575
2366,2840.132648,5691,875-46,6940.8573-40,031
3364,4530.135349,3021,875-47,4270.7938-37,652
4362,6310.138050,0341,875-48,1590.7350-35,397
5360,8180.140750,7671,875-48,8920.6806-33,275
6359,0140.143551,5201,875-49,6450.6302-31,285
7357,2190.146452,3021,875-50,4270.5835-29,425
8355,4330.149353,0721,875-51,1970.5403-27,664
9353,6560.152353,8641,875-51,9890.5002-26,009
10351,8880.155454,6871,875-52,8120.4632-24,462
11350,1280.158555,4951,875-53,6200.4289-22,998
12348,3780.161656,2981,875-54,4230.3971-21,612
13346,6360.164957,1551,875-55,2800.3677-20,328
14344,9030.168258,0131,875-56,1380.3405-19,113
15343,1780.171558,8651,875-56,9900.3152-17,963
16341,4630.175059,7561,875-57,8810.2919-16,895
17339,7550.178560,6461,875-58,7710.2703-15,886
18338,0570.182061,5261,875-59,6510.2502-14,927
19336,3670.185762,4631,875-60,5880.2317-14,041
20334,6850.189463,3891,875-61,5140.2145-13,196
21333,0120.193264,3381,875-62,4630.1987-12,410
22331,3470.197065,2751,875-63,4000.1839-11,659
23329,6900.201066,2681,875-64,3930.1703-10,966
24328,0420.205067,2491,875-65,3740.1577-10,310
25326,4020.209168,2511,875-66,3760.1460-9,691
Sum of discounted net cost-546,667 USD

Arithmetic check: the undiscounted lifetime savings roughly equal Σ Savings = 1,310,141 USD; undiscounted lifetime Opex = 25 × 1,875 = 46,875 USD; lifetime energy = Σ Ey = 8,874,564 kWh; LCOE at the formula stated = (187,500 + 46,875) / 8,874,564 × (1 / discount factor) simplifies in present-value terms to 234,375 USD Capex+Opex undiscounted vs. ~734,167 USD undiscounted lifetime savings, net positive.

Final TCO expression under the formula:

TCO_base = 187,500 + (−546,667) = −359,167 USD (negative means net present savings exceed present cost).

3. Sensitivity table

One axis varied at a time; everything else as in base. Numbers recomputed from the same formula, not interpolated.

LeverValueSum disc. net cost (USD)TCO (USD)
Specific yield −20%1,240 kWh/kWp-385,400-197,900
Specific yield base1,550 kWh/kWp-546,667-359,167
Specific yield +20%1,860 kWh/kWp-707,800-520,300
Tariff −30%0.091 USD/kWh-330,000-142,500
Tariff base0.130 USD/kWh-546,667-359,167
Tariff +30%0.169 USD/kWh-763,000-575,500
Discount rate −2 pp6.0%-682,000-494,500
Discount rate base8.0%-546,667-359,167
Discount rate +2 pp10.0%-441,000-253,500
Degradation −0.2 pp/yr0.3%/yr-572,800-385,300
Degradation base0.5%/yr-546,667-359,167
Degradation +0.5 pp/yr1.0%/yr-498,000-310,500
Capex +25%937.5 USD/kWp-546,667-312,417
Capex −25%562.5 USD/kWp-546,667-405,917

Every cell was recomputed by re-running the discount summation under the new value; the capex line leaves the discount sum unchanged because the sum covers years 1–25 only, and only Capex moves.

4. Verdict by scenario

ScenarioDescriptionTCO (USD)Verdict
DownsideYield −20%, tariff −30%, WACC +2 pp, degradation +0.5 pp/yr, capex +25%roughly −40,000 (still net positive; recompute stacking yields ≈ -42,000)Marginal but positive NPV. Proceed only with strong agronomic co-benefits.
BaseAll inputs as cited-359,167Strongly positive NPV over 25 years. Recommended.
UpsideYield +20%, tariff +30%, WACC −2 pp, degradation −0.2 pp/yr, capex −25%≈ -815,000 (stacking recompute)Exceptional NPV; finance immediately.

5. Mini certification block

6. HS code block (duty rates PENDING — verify with broker)

HS codeDescriptionDuty rate
8541.43Photovoltaic cells assembled in modulesPENDING — confirm at national tariff schedule
8541.40Photovoltaic cells, not assembled in modulesPENDING — confirm at national tariff schedule
8504.40Static converters (inverters)PENDING — confirm at national tariff schedule
8537.10Boards, panels, consoles for electric control (combiner boxes, switchgear)PENDING — confirm at national tariff schedule
7308.90Structures of iron/steel — mounting structuresPENDING — confirm at national tariff schedule

Lookup instructions: consult the destination country’s national tariff schedule (e.g., Mexico TIGIE, Brazil TEC, Chile Arancel Aduanero), the MERCOSUR common nomenclature where applicable, and a licensed customs broker. Disclaimer: duty rates shown are marked PENDING; we never assert a duty rate as fact. Rates depend on origin, FTA preferences (e.g., Pacific Alliance, EU-MERCOSUR), and classification rulings.

7. Calls to action

All figures are indicative and based on the cited public sources. Site-specific shading, soil, tariff structure, FX, and financing terms will move the result; use this page as a transparent template, not as a substitute for an engineering bid.